Posts Tagged ‘New York Times’
We did not want to comment and provide Ann Coulter any further exposure because that is her end game. Coulter is by all accounts a highly intelligent person however she is what she is. Coulter is the now version of what a shock jock used to be. They call themselves political pundits; write books, articles, appear on television and radio programs. They make statements designed to capitalize on shock value, use language in a carefully crafted manner to keep them relevant in a world where television and the education system has left the masses being spoon-fed what to think instead of reading, comprehension and independent thought. -Greg Kelly, Partner, K2 Global Communications llc
Back to Ann Coulter’s article – she wrote that “No law is ever going to require a woman to bear the child of her rapist.” I don’t believe that. Laws DID protect children like me and these protections can and should be restored. She went on to add: “Yes, it’s every bit as much a life as an unborn child that is not the product of rape.” Ann, your words speak volumes as to what you really believe. A preborn child is not an “it.” He or she is a life, a human being, a person, a son or a daughter. They have a gender. This is not a mere philosophical or political exercise, but real people’s lives are at stake. When I represented the mother in Michigan’s “frozen embryo” case, the fertility doctors testified at deposition that from one cell, they are literally male and female, and ascertainably so! Just as it says in Genesis, “male and female, He created them.” Using words of gender serve to demonstrate the humanity of these children. -Excerpt From Rebecca Kiessling’s Reply to Ann Coulter — Save The 1!
We have posted many times on the importance of language pertaining to Government Systems. We are glad Kiessling noticed this with Coulter because language does matter.
There has historically been a great manipulation, deception, and misinformation campaign in the Battle of Good vs. Evil on the issue of Life.
Words do matter. At any point that the public can be persuaded through the dehumanization and objectification process that a human life at any stage is an “It” “Thing” or “Object” then to destroy life can be justified.
This can be the slaughter of the innocents in a mother’s womb, the killing of those considered unfit or a burden on society and resources such as those with mental/physical health issues, the poor, or even as history has taught us to advance racial program’s designed to annihilate whole groups of Peoples.
Recommended Reading For Coulter:
In the second decade of the twentieth century, an idea became all too fashionable among those who feel it is their right to set social trends. Wealthy families took it on as a pet cause, generously bankrolling its research. The New York Times praised it as a wonderful “new science.” Scientists, such as the brilliant plant biologist, Luther Burbank, praised it unashamedly. Educators as prominent as Charles Elliot, President of Harvard University, promoted it as a solution to social ills. America’s public schools did their part. In the 1920s, almost three-fourths of high school social science textbooks taught its principles. Not to be outdone, judges and physicians called for those principles to be enshrined into law. Congress agree, passing the 1924 immigration law to exclude from American shores the people of Eastern and Southern Europe that the idea branded as inferior. In 1927, the U. S. Supreme Court joined the chorus, ruling by a lopsided vote of 8 to 1 that the sterilization of unwilling men and women was constitutional.
That idea was eugenics and in the English-speaking world it had virtually no critics among the “chattering classes.” When he wrote this book, Chesterton stood virtually alone against the intellectual world of his day. Yet to his eternal credit, he showed no sign of being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary, he thunders against eugenics…Full review on GoodReads
Interesting is how Coulter refuses to accept any blame whatsoever through her direct participation in raising the false flag of politics distracting the American voter while the Corpo-Banker Government Globalist Elites were implementing their programmes of Socio-Economic Chaos aimed at the destruction of Western Civilization and Christianity. It did not matter who won the election for there is no distinction between the Corpo-Banker Government Globalist Elite backers of the Republican and Democrat parties and their candidates.
Our questions for Coulter:
1. Is it ever right to abandon the moral and natural laws for political expediency?
2. Please tell me what horrific act have our brothers/sisters in their mother’s womb committed that would justify them being put to death?
3. What have they done that is so heinous that you would condemn them to a brutal death being ripped apart limb by limb, having their skulls crushed while they are still alive feeling all the pain?
Please state for us the crime Our Brothers/Sisters in Their Mother’s Womb are accused of? What Court of Law was their trial held? Who was on the Jury of their peers? Were they afforded their Right to Appeal? Governors Stay of Execution?
Kiessling sums it all up best:
Lastly, Ann Coulter goes on to suggest being 100% pro-life is not wise because too much of a good thing can harm you – like too much iron, or too much sugar in your coffee. I couldn’t help but think of the words of Mother Teresa: “How can you say there are too many children? That’s like saying there are too many flowers.” No offense Ann, but I’d rather heed the words of a godly woman like Mother Teresa than you. - Excerpt From Rebecca Kiessling’s Reply to Ann Coulter — Save The 1!
About Greg Kelly:
Neither Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, Capitalist or Communist.
Catholic proponent of The Moral and Natural Laws, the Economic Theory of Distributism and 100% Pro-Life, No Exceptions.
His professional experience includes specializing in public relations, international relations, public/government affairs, corporate communications, and relationship building from the local-to-international level. He has worked as an assistant to Benjamin A. Gilman, former Chairman of the House International Relations Committee and a member of Congress from 1973 to 2003. He is also the former Manager of Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising for the Korea National Tourism Organization where his duties included speech writing for senior Korean government officials and establishing and maintaining working relationships with various foreign and domestic companies, government agencies and media outlets.
Greg Kelly is a combat veteran having served in the United States Army with the rank of Sergeant in the “America’s Guard of Honor” 82nd Airborne Division (Grenada) and “Second-2-None” 2nd Infantry Division (Korea).
Memberships: ALL-AMERICAN MEMBER 82ND AIRBORNE DIVISION ASSOCIATION
© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC 2010-2012. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
I often hear that what breed of dog you share your life with tells a lot about your personality and character traits. What read today on the New York Times Blog: Your Dog Is Watching You By TARA PARKER-POPE confirmed what we have been coaching our celebrity clients on for years…Observe, Learn = Steer the interview/Conversation, Control the Narrative (of your appearance).
Client AAA maintains a polite, respectful personality. However on the financial shows you have to speak up or the ‘sharks’ will eat you alive and then spit your bones out, leaving you with little or no face time to present yourself and your expertise.
How not to compromise ‘AAA’s polite, respectful personality yet get the face time on the shows?
If the question(s) is not directed at you specifically wait for one of the other panelists to do the topic ‘intro’ for you. Observe when the other panelist
pauses to take in a breath, immediately start presenting your expertise on the topic thus you still appear to be polite and respectful but you now are the
expert for the show.
The lesson here as put forth by well your dog and penned by Tara Parker-Pope is this: Be Your Dog…Observe, Learn = Steer the Interview/Conversation, Control the Narrative (of your appearance).
Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking - Monique A. R. Udell , Nicole R. Dorey and Clive D. L. Wynne
Greg Kelly Partner
K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS. 2010-2011.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and
written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.
Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to
K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS with appropriate and specific
direction to the original content.
The real victim of Pfc. Manning is not The State Department nor is it even the US Military it is The Constitution of The United States of America which is our framework for our Rule of Law, the guarantor of our very freedoms.
Manning was entrusted with the sacred trust that the American people believe our men and women in uniform are VOLENS et POTENS to carry with honor, courage and sacrifice of one’s life when called upon, to carry that trust in the execution of daily duties whether in combat or in an office at the Pentagon. Manning is guilty of betraying our sacred trust, guilty of High Treason and Subversion.
In the United States the civilians are the watchdogs of government with the Commander-in-Chief and the Secretary of Defense being civilian and Congressional oversight, It is not the U.S. Military nor any individual under its jurisdiction or employ lest the military is to grow more powerful than the people it serves.
Intentional, as an agent of chaos or not, Pfc. Manning enabled the Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ to set a trap for the US Government that is hastening the deconstruction of our Constitution and our very freedoms it guarantees and many have given their lives for.
The Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Trap Is Sprung:
- If our government does not aggressively pursue the High Treason and Subversive charges then our Rule of Law based on The Constitution of The United States becomes meaningless inviting Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Chaos.
- If our government does aggressively pursue the High Treason and Subversive charges then our Rule of Law based on The Constitution of The United States becomes a target for the Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ and their media friends branding the Constitution as an archaic, draconian document to be deconstructed in favor of international law or global governance, Chaos achieved.
- Sexuality/Human Rights Dog & Pony Show: The media, in this instance The New York Times, has made the issues at hand not Pfc. Manning’s criminal activity but rather has made it about his sexuality and human rights. This was done in order to ensure the involvement of groups like Amnesty International and The United Nations in order to further dismantle our Constitution and Sovereignty in favor of international law and global governance.
- Government/Social Media Censorship: Inviting Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Chaos, the government in cooperation with Facebook let loose the howling dogs of censorship, see What Happened to Our Facebook Page with 10,000+ Supporters? On the Bradley Manning Support Network page.
Unless Pfc. Manning performed his action on lawful orders from his Commander-in-Chief, President Obama, The Secretary of Defense or his Military Chain-of-Command, he committed High Treason and Subversion.
His sexuality IS NOT an excuse for criminal activity if it is than the case will then be made that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve in the military as active threats to national security.
Pfc. Manning felt lost while in The Big Green Machine. The military is not a place to go and search for the comfort of your mothers tit or be a stand out.
This is where his logic got him into trouble.
The military is: “Mission First…People Always” you are part of something larger than the individual/self. If you cannot accept that then your actions will get many honorable men and women killed.