Are you 100% pro-life, even in cases of rape? Life is beautiful, save the one!

Are you 100% pro-life, even in cases of rape?

We’ve all heard someone say: “I’m pro-life… except in cases of rape,” or “I’m pro-choice, especially in cases of rape!”
I do hope that the stories and videos on this website will help to put faces and voices to this issue.

Rape and abortion are wrong for the same reason; they are both violent acts of aggression against another person. If you really care about rape victims, you should want to protect them from the rapist, and from the abortion, and NOT the baby. A baby is not the worst thing which can happen to a rape victim — an abortion is.

About

 

Our mission is simple — remove exceptions from the law, beginning with the Hyde Amendment.

In order to achieve this, we must encourage every pro-life organization to be a standard-bearer, and help them to understand why we must not accept the exceptions — whether it’s within legislation, or in a candidate’s position on abortion.

 

Christians should remember the lesson that Jesus taught through the parable of the lost sheep:

¹² “What do you think? If a man owns a hundred sheep, and one of them wanders away, will he not leave the ninety-nine on the hills and go to look for the one that wandered off? ¹³ And if he finds it, truly I tell you, he is happier about that one sheep than about the ninety-nine that did not wander off. ¹⁴ In the same way your Father in heaven is not willing that any of these little ones should perish.” – Matthew 18:12-14

No Exceptions

No Compromise

However long God lets me live on this earth, I pledge to not accept the rape exceptions — whether from candidates, elected officials, organizations, or legislation. 

I pledge to be 100% pro-life, without compromise, I pledge to work to “Save the 1″, working to remove exceptions from the law.

SIGN THE PLEDGE, I DID TO SAVE THE 1  SIGN PLEDGE: HERE

Copyright © Save the 1

 

K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC Recommended Reading: Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State by G.K. Chesterton

In the second decade of the twentieth century, an idea  became all too fashionable among those who feel it is their right to  set social trends. Wealthy families took it on as a pet cause,  generously bankrolling its research. The New York Times praised  it as a wonderful “new science.” Scientists, such as the brilliant  plant biologist, Luther Burbank, praised it unashamedly. Educators as  prominent as Charles Elliot, President of Harvard University, promoted  it as a solution to social ills. America’s public schools did their  part. In the 1920s, almost three-fourths of high school social science  textbooks taught its principles. Not to be outdone, judges and  physicians called for those principles to be enshrined into  law. Congress agree, passing the 1924 immigration law to exclude from  American shores the people of Eastern and Southern Europe that the  idea branded as inferior. In 1927, the U. S. Supreme Court joined the  chorus, ruling by a lopsided vote of 8 to 1 that the sterilization of  unwilling men and women was constitutional.

That idea was eugenics and in the English-speaking world it had  virtually no critics among the “chattering classes.”  When he wrote  this book, Chesterton stood virtually alone against the intellectual  world of his day. Yet to his eternal credit, he showed no sign of  being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary, he  thunders against eugenics, ranking it one of the great evils of modern  society. And, in perhaps one of the most chillingly accurate  prophecies of the century, he warns that the ideas that eugenics had  unleashed were likely to bear bitter fruit in another nation. That  nation was Germany, the “very land of scientific culture from which  the ideal of a Superman had come.” In fact, the very group that Nazism  tried to exterminate, Eastern European Jews, and the group it targeted  for later extermination, the Slavs, were two of those whose biological  unfitness eugenists sought so eagerly to confirm.

What are sometimes called the “excesses” of Nazism drove the open advocacy of eugenics underground. But there’s little evidence that the elements of society who once trumpeted  the idea have changed their mind. Dr. Alan Guttmacher provides a good example. The fact that he had been Vice-President of the American Eugenics Association was no hindrance to his assuming the Presidency of Planned Parenthood­World Population in 1962. And his seedy past did not keep Congress from providing millions of dollars in federal funds to Planned Parenthood. Nor did it stop the Supreme Court from carrying out the central item in Dr. Guttmacher’s political agenda‹legalized abortion. Many of those who now admit that eugenics was evil have trouble explaining why so few of its advocates were every exposed and why so many are still honored.

As the title suggests, eugenics is not the only evil that Chesterton blasts. Socialism gets some brilliantly worded broadsides and Chesterton, in complete fairness, does not spare capitalism. He also attacks the scientifically justified regimentation that others call the “health police.” The same rationalizations that justified eugenics, he notes, can also be used to deprive a working man of his beer or any man of his pipe. Although it was first published in 1922, there’s a startling relevance to what Chesterton had to say about mettlesome bureaucrats who deprive life of its little pleasures and freedoms. His tale about an unfortunate man fired because “his old cherry-briar” “might set the water-works on fire” is priceless.

That tale illustrates Chesterton’s brilliant use of humor, a knack his foes were quick to realize. In their review of his book, Birth Control News griped, “His tendency is reactionary, and as he succeeds in making most people laugh, his influence in the wrong direction is considerable. Eugenics Review was even blunter. “The only interest in this book,” they said, “is pathological. It is a revelation of the ineptitude to which ignorance and blind prejudice may reduce an intelligent man.”

History has been far kinder to Chesterton than to his critics. It’s now generally agree that eugenics was born of evolution and the “ignorance and blind prejudice” of social elites. But never forget that Chesterton was the first to say so, condemning what many of his peers praised.

The completely new edition of Chesterton’s classic includes almost fifty pages from the writings of Chesterton’s opponents. They illustrate just how accurate his attacks on eugenists were. For researchers, it also includes a detailed, 13-page index.

 

About Greg Kelly:

Neither Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, Capitalist or Communist.

Catholic proponent of The Moral and Natural Laws, the Economic Theory of Distributism and 100% Pro-Life, No Exceptions.

 

 

 

Ann Coulter the Problem Not Pro-Life Advocates

We did not want to comment and provide Ann Coulter any further exposure because that is her end game. Coulter is by all accounts a highly intelligent person however she is what she is. Coulter is the now version of what a shock jock used to be. They call themselves political pundits; write books, articles, appear on television and radio programs. They make statements designed to capitalize on shock value, use language in a carefully crafted manner to keep them relevant in a world where television and the education system has left the masses being spoon-fed what to think instead of reading, comprehension and independent thought. -Greg Kelly, Partner, K2 Global Communications llc

Rebecca Kiessling: International Pro-Life Speaker, Attorney

Back to Ann Coulter’s article – she wrote that “No law is ever going to require a woman to bear the child of her rapist.” I don’t believe that. Laws DID protect children like me and these protections can and should be restored. She went on to add: “Yes, it’s every bit as much a life as an unborn child that is not the product of rape.” Ann, your words speak volumes as to what you really believe. A preborn child is not an “it.” He or she is a life, a human being, a person, a son or a daughter. They have a gender. This is not a mere philosophical or political exercise, but real people’s lives are at stake. When I represented the mother in Michigan’s “frozen embryo” case, the fertility doctors testified at deposition that from one cell, they are literally male and female, and ascertainably so! Just as it says in Genesis, “male and female, He created them.” Using words of gender serve to demonstrate the humanity of these children. -Excerpt From Rebecca Kiessling’s Reply to Ann Coulter — Save The 1!

We have posted many times on the importance of language pertaining to Government Systems. We are glad Kiessling noticed this with Coulter because language does matter.

There has historically been a great manipulation, deception, and misinformation campaign in the Battle of Good vs. Evil on the issue of Life.

Words do matter. At any point that the public can be persuaded through the dehumanization and objectification process that a human life at any stage is an “It” “Thing” or “Object” then to destroy life can be justified.

This can be the slaughter of the innocents in a mother’s womb, the killing of those considered unfit or a burden on society and resources such as those with mental/physical health issues, the poor, or even as history has taught us to advance racial program’s designed to annihilate whole groups of Peoples.

Recommended Reading For Coulter:

Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State by G.K. Chesterton

In the second decade of the twentieth century, an idea became all too fashionable among those who feel it is their right to set social trends. Wealthy families took it on as a pet cause, generously bankrolling its research. The New York Times praised it as a wonderful “new science.” Scientists, such as the brilliant plant biologist, Luther Burbank, praised it unashamedly. Educators as prominent as Charles Elliot, President of Harvard University, promoted it as a solution to social ills. America’s public schools did their part. In the 1920s, almost three-fourths of high school social science textbooks taught its principles. Not to be outdone, judges and physicians called for those principles to be enshrined into law. Congress agree, passing the 1924 immigration law to exclude from American shores the people of Eastern and Southern Europe that the idea branded as inferior. In 1927, the U. S. Supreme Court joined the chorus, ruling by a lopsided vote of 8 to 1 that the sterilization of unwilling men and women was constitutional.
That idea was eugenics and in the English-speaking world it had virtually no critics among the “chattering classes.” When he wrote this book, Chesterton stood virtually alone against the intellectual world of his day. Yet to his eternal credit, he showed no sign of being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary, he thunders against eugenics…Full review on GoodReads

Interesting is how Coulter refuses to accept any blame whatsoever through her direct participation in raising the false flag of politics distracting the American voter while the Corpo-Banker Government Globalist Elites were implementing their programmes of Socio-Economic Chaos aimed at the destruction of Western Civilization and Christianity. It did not matter who won the election for there is no distinction between the Corpo-Banker Government Globalist Elite backers of the Republican and Democrat parties and their candidates.

Our questions for Coulter:

1. Is it ever right to abandon the moral and natural laws for political expediency?

2. Please tell me what horrific act have our brothers/sisters in their mother’s womb committed that would justify them being put to death?

3. What have they done that is so heinous that you would condemn them to a brutal death being ripped apart limb by limb, having their skulls crushed while they are still alive feeling all the pain?

Please state for us the crime Our Brothers/Sisters in Their Mother’s Womb are accused of? What Court of Law was their trial held? Who was on the Jury of their peers? Were they afforded their Right to Appeal? Governors Stay of Execution?

Kiessling sums it all up best:

Lastly, Ann Coulter goes on to suggest being 100% pro-life is not wise because too much of a good thing can harm you – like too much iron, or too much sugar in your coffee. I couldn’t help but think of the words of Mother Teresa: “How can you say there are too many children? That’s like saying there are too many flowers.” No offense Ann, but I’d rather heed the words of a godly woman like Mother Teresa than you. - Excerpt From Rebecca Kiessling’s Reply to Ann Coulter — Save The 1!

About Greg Kelly:

Neither Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, Capitalist or Communist.
Catholic proponent of The Moral and Natural Laws, the Economic Theory of Distributism and 100% Pro-Life, No Exceptions.

His professional experience includes specializing in public relations, international relations, public/government affairs, corporate communications, and relationship building from the local-to-international level. He has worked as an assistant to Benjamin A. Gilman, former Chairman of the House International Relations Committee and a member of Congress from 1973 to 2003. He is also the former Manager of Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising for the Korea National Tourism Organization where his duties included speech writing for senior Korean government officials and establishing and maintaining working relationships with various foreign and domestic companies, government agencies and media outlets.

Mr. Kelly graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from State University of New York at Potsdam where he majored in political science and minored in communications.

Greg Kelly is a combat veteran having served in the United States Army with the rank of Sergeant in the “America’s Guard of Honor” 82nd Airborne Division (Grenada) and “Second-2-None” 2nd Infantry Division (Korea).

Memberships: ALL-AMERICAN MEMBER 82ND AIRBORNE DIVISION ASSOCIATION

© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC 2010-2012. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Recommended Reading: Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State by G.K. Chesterton

K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC Recommended Reading: Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State by G.K. Chesterton

In the second decade of the twentieth century, an idea became all too fashionable among those who feel it is their right to set social trends. Wealthy families took it on as a pet cause, generously bankrolling its research. The New York Times praised it as a wonderful “new science.” Scientists, such as the brilliant plant biologist, Luther Burbank, praised it unashamedly. Educators as prominent as Charles Elliot, President of Harvard University, promoted it as a solution to social ills. America’s public schools did their part. In the 1920s, almost three-fourths of high school social science textbooks taught its principles. Not to be outdone, judges and physicians called for those principles to be enshrined into law. Congress agree, passing the 1924 immigration law to exclude from American shores the people of Eastern and Southern Europe that the idea branded as inferior. In 1927, the U. S. Supreme Court joined the chorus, ruling by a lopsided vote of 8 to 1 that the sterilization of unwilling men and women was constitutional.

That idea was eugenics and in the English-speaking world it had virtually no critics among the “chattering classes.” When he wrote this book, Chesterton stood virtually alone against the intellectual world of his day. Yet to his eternal credit, he showed no sign of being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary, he thunders against eugenics…Full review on GoodReads

About K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC:

Our network specialists cover the areas of International Relations, Public Diplomacy, Culture and Culinary Arts, Music, Tourism and Travel, Religion, Government Systems, Economics, Community Affairs, Non-Profits, Celebrities and Personalities.

K2 Global Communications, LLC is a highly experienced, creative and most importantly – respected – network of professionals spanning diverse categories, segments of business, industry, government, communities and cultures. Emerging Market Identification and Relationship Building from the Local-to-International Level.

Our clients benefit from 45 years of combined knowledge, expertise and contacts of our firm’s principles/partners Zach Martin and Gregory Kelly in their respective fields; always placing the client’s name/brand out front.

© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC. 2010-2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Obama’s Violent Communist Revolution vs. God…Bishops Vow to Fight Coercive HHS Mandate

CONTACT CONGRESS NOW!  HERE

Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, president of the USCCB, sharply criticized the decision by the Obama administration in which it “ordered almost every employer and insurer in the country to provide sterilization and contraceptives, including some abortion-inducing drugs, in their health plans….Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience. This shouldn’t happen in a land where free exercise of religion ranks first in the Bill of Rights.”

He urged Catholics and the public at large to speak out in protest. Watch his video & then take action today!

See the impressive list of links to the bishops’ statements.

VIDEO: Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, president of the USCCB, sharply criticized the decision by the Obama administration, HHS mandate 

USCCB Responds to Misleading White House Blog Entry

“White House Misrepresents Its Own Contraceptive Mandate“

The Obama administration, to justify its widely-criticized mandate for contraception and sterilization coverage in private health plans, has posted a set of false and misleading claims on the White House blog (“Health Reform, Preventive Services, and Religious Institutions,” February 1). This new USCCB fact sheet quotes and responds to each claim in turn.

More Background

The HHS has issued a rule forcing nearly all private health plans to include coverage for all FDA-approved prescription contraceptive drugs and devices, as well as surgical sterilization. These are listed among “preventive services for women” that all health plans will have to cover without co-pays or other cost-sharing — regardless of whether the insurer, the employer or other plan sponsor, or even the woman herself objects to such coverage.

The exemption provided for “religious employers” is so narrow that it fails to cover the vast majority of faith-based organizations, including Catholic hospitals, universities, and service organizations that help millions every year. Ironically, not even Jesus & his disciples would have qualified.

During the public comment period last fall, the bishops’ grassroots campaign alone generated over 57,000 comments to HHS opposing their mandate.

Now that the Administration has refused to recognize the Constitutional conscience rights of organizations and individuals who oppose the mandate, the bishops are now urging Catholics and others of good will to fight this unprecedented attack on conscience rights and religious liberty.

More than 400 Catholic leaders have called on Congress and the Administration to protect conscience rights in health care. The open letter appeared as a full page ad featuring over 150 of those leaders in the New York Times and the Washington Post on December 21.

Get Informed & Take Action Now

• Write to Congress. . . urging support for the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179, S. 1467).
• Share this page with others so they can get informed & take action, too. Social media & e-mail options are found under “SHARE” at the upper right of this page — and at the upper right corner of Cardinal-designate Dolan’s video. . . .
• Will contraception really be “free” under this coercive mandate? Read Richard Doerflinger’s column “The High Costs of ‘Free’ Birth Control” to find out.
• There’s lots of confusion about what the HHS edict involves. For a quick summary, see our 2-page FAQ called The HHS Mandate for Contraception/Sterilization Coverage: An Attack on Rights of Conscience.
  
• For more information on the HHS mandate and its inadequate conscience protection, read our Preventive Services Backgrounder.

Select News Releases

• Bishops Renew Call to Legislative Action on Religious Liberty- February 10+  Regulatory changes limited and unclear

  +  Rescission of mandate only complete solution

  +  Continue urging passage of Respect for Rights of Conscience Act

• Bishops Studying Initial White House Movement On Religious Liberty – February 10
• Bishops Decry HHS Rule, Urge Catholics to Stand Up for Religious Liberty and Conscience Rights in Homilies at Vigil for Life - January 23
• Cardinal-Designate Dolan Speaks Out Against HHS Rule, Calls For Action In New Web Video - January 20
• U.S. Bishops Vow to Fight HHS Edict – January 20
• U.S. Bishops Welcome Pope’s Reaffirmation of Religious Liberty During Ad Limina Visit – January 19
• Bishops Hail Court Decision Upholding Religious Liberty – January 11, 2012
• Cardinal Calls For Greater Conscience Protection In Health Care Reform On Eve Of Subcommittee Hearing – November 1, 2011
• Cardinal Reaffirms Support for Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, Cites HHS Mandate as Cause for Urgency - September 7, 2011
• USCCB Urges Rescission of HHS Contraceptive Mandate,Criticizes ‘Inexplicably Narrow’ Definition of Religious Freedom - August 31, 2011

Additional Information on Conscience Protection (opens new page)

• Fact Sheets, Columns & Commentary
• Official USCCB Testimony and Letters
• News Release Archive

****Reposted As Faithful Catholics, Catholic Business and American Citizens****

K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC: HIGH PROFILE - HIGH IMPACT PUBLIC RELATIONS

About K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC;

Our network specialists cover the areas of International Relations, Public Diplomacy, Culture and Culinary Arts, Music, Tourism and Travel, Religion, Politics, Government, Community Affairs, Non-Profits, Celebrities and Personalities.

K2 Global Communications, LLC is a highly experienced, creative and most importantly – respected – network of professionals spanning diverse categories, segments of business, industry, government, communities and cultures. Emerging Market Identification and Relationship Building from the Local-to-International Level.

Our clients benefit from 45 years of combined knowledge, expertise and contacts of our firm’s principles/partners Zach Martin and Gregory Kelly in their respective fields; always placing the client’s name/brand out front.

© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS. 2010-2011. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

 

 

K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC: Hanging with the Big Dogs, Prepping Clients for Media Appearances…

I often hear that what breed of dog you share your life with tells a lot about your personality and character traits.  What read today on the New York Times Blog: Your Dog Is Watching You By TARA PARKER-POPE confirmed what we have been coaching our celebrity clients on for years…Observe, Learn = Steer the  interview/Conversation, Control the Narrative (of your appearance).

Case Study:

One Saturday I was observing a prominent financial services industry client ‘AAA’ on the news/talk show circuit in New York City leading into tax season.

Client AAA maintains a polite, respectful personality.  However on the financial shows you have to speak up or the ‘sharks’ will eat you alive and then spit your bones out, leaving you with little or no face time to present yourself and your expertise.

Problem:

How not to compromise ‘AAA’s polite, respectful personality yet get the face time on the shows?

Solution:

If the question(s) is not directed at you specifically wait for one of the other panelists to do the topic ‘intro’ for you.  Observe when the other panelist
pauses to take in a breath, immediately start presenting your expertise on the topic thus you still appear to be polite and respectful but you now are the
expert for the show.

The lesson here as put forth by well your dog and penned by Tara Parker-Pope is this:  Be Your Dog…Observe,  Learn = Steer the Interview/Conversation, Control the Narrative (of your appearance).

Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking - Monique A. R. Udell , Nicole R. Dorey and Clive D.  L. Wynne

Greg Kelly Partner

K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC

Website: www.k2globalcomm.com

 Artist and Celebrity Management | Publicity and Marketing | Multimedia Channels | Public Relations | International Relations |  Government Affairs | Corporate Communications

 

© K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS. 2010-2011.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and
written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.
Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to
K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC and CLIENTS with appropriate and specific
direction to the original content.

Pfc. Manning, the U.S. Constitution: Progressive-Globalist Chaos Agenda Achieved

The real victim of Pfc. Manning is not The State Department nor is it even the US Military it is The Constitution of The United States of America which is our framework for our Rule of Law, the guarantor of our very freedoms.

Pfc. Manning is No Hero:

Pfc. Manning took an oath just as many before him to protect and serve the American people, defend the Constitution against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic. 

Manning was entrusted with the sacred trust that the American people believe our men and women in uniform are VOLENS et POTENS to carry with honor, courage and sacrifice of one’s life when called upon, to carry that trust in the execution of daily duties whether in combat or in an office at the Pentagon. Manning is guilty of betraying our sacred trust, guilty of High Treason and Subversion.

In the United States the civilians are the watchdogs of government with the Commander-in-Chief and the Secretary of Defense being civilian and Congressional oversight, It is not the U.S. Military nor any individual under its jurisdiction or employ lest the military is to grow more powerful than the people it serves.

Intentional, as an agent of chaos or not, Pfc. Manning enabled the Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ to set a trap for the US Government that is hastening the deconstruction of our Constitution and our very freedoms it guarantees and many have given their lives for.

The Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Trap Is Sprung:

1. If our government does not aggressively pursue the High Treason and Subversive charges then our Rule of Law based on The Constitution of The United States becomes meaningless inviting Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Chaos.
2. If our government does aggressively pursue the High Treason and Subversive charges then our Rule of Law based on The Constitution of The United States becomes a target for the Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ and their media friends branding the Constitution as an archaic, draconian document to be deconstructed in favor of international law or global governance, Chaos achieved.
3. Sexuality/Human Rights Dog & Pony Show:  The media, in this instance The New York Times,  has made the issues at hand not Pfc. Manning’s criminal activity but rather has made it about his sexuality and human rights.  This was done in order to ensure the involvement of groups like Amnesty International and The United Nations in order to further dismantle our Constitution and Sovereignty in favor of international law and global governance.
4. Government/Social Media Censorship: Inviting Progressive-Globalist ‘Jackboots’ Chaos, the government in cooperation with Facebook let loose the howling dogs of censorship, see What Happened to Our Facebook Page with 10,000+ Supporters? On the Bradley Manning Support Network page.

Unless Pfc. Manning performed his action on lawful orders from his Commander-in-Chief, President Obama, The Secretary of Defense or his Military Chain-of-Command, he committed High Treason and Subversion. 

His sexuality IS NOT an excuse for criminal activity if it is than the case will then be made that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve in the military as active threats to national security.

Pfc. Manning felt lost while in The Big Green Machine.  The military is not a place to go and search for the comfort of your mothers tit or be a stand out. 

This is where his logic got him into trouble. 

The military is: “Mission First…People Always” you are part of something larger than the individual/self. If you cannot accept that then your actions will get many honorable men and women killed.